Most research investigating the confirmation bias involves abstract experimental tasks where subjects draw inferences from just a few items of evidence.
Confirmation Bias in Complex Analyses
Download Resources
PDF Accessibility
One or more of the PDF files on this page fall under E202.2 Legacy Exceptions and may not be completely accessible. You may request an accessible version of a PDF using the form on the Contact Us page.
Most research investigating the confirmation bias involves abstract experimental tasks where subjects draw inferences from just a few items of evidence. These tasks are not representative of complex analysis tasks characteristic of law enforcement investigations, financial analysis and intelligence analysis. This study examines the confirmation bias in a more complex analysis task and evaluates a recommended procedure, called Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH), designed to mitigate confirmation bias. Results indicate that participant assessment of new evidence was significantly impacted by beliefs they held at the time evidence was received. Evidence confirming current beliefs was given more "weight" than disconfirming evidence. However, current beliefs did not influence the assessment of whether an evidence item was confirming or disconfirming. ACH did reduce confirmation bias, but the effect was limited to participants without professional analysis experience.